Overview

In 04 I said the voice is the carrier of culture. The voice that teaches, that warns, that brings the colony into step. So what happens to that culture when the colony breaks?

Let me give the answer first: it does not come back. More precisely, the number of bodies returns, but the knowledge does not. When collapse comes, the first thing lost is not the number of individuals — it is the knowledge.

Knowledge Needs a Number of Teachers

The "vocabulary" of the voice is not something a rat is born with. It is culture, inherited as the young learn from adults. And the more complex the knowledge, the more users it takes to keep it alive.

This is known in human culture too. The more complex a tool or skill becomes, the more people who can demonstrate and teach it you need to pass it to the next generation. When there are too few teachers, the most complex things go first, lost without being rebuilt＊.

I made the model work the same way. Each cultural item carries a number of teachers needed to keep it. Simple items survive with only a few. Complex items cannot survive without many teachers.

def maintain(item, adults):
    # If too few teachers know the item, no one can learn it, and it is simply lost (never rebuilt).
    if count_who_know(item, adults) < item.teachers_needed:
        item.alive = False
    return item.alive

Bodies Return, Knowledge Does Not

Now I look again at the collapse from 02, this time through the eyes of knowledge. When the capacity for roles runs short, the teaching side drops sharply. The number of bodies lingers for a while, and when the crowding eases it even recovers in waves. But the teachers cannot keep up.

Then the most complex cultural items go first: they fall below the number of teachers needed to keep them, and disappear. Once an item is gone, it does not return. What no one knows, no one can learn.

At collapse, bodies return in waves while culture drops in steps and does not return
At collapse. Bodies (gray) return in waves, but culture (red) drops in steps and does not return. Teachers (orange) cannot keep up either. On the right, as a share of the peak: bodies 45%, teachers 20%, knowledge 24%.

The numbers make it clear. A colony with enough roles kept all 10 of 10 cultural items. A colony that collapsed kept only 2.4, even when it survived. Against the peak, bodies returned to 45%, but teachers to 20% and knowledge to 24%. Bodies recover more easily; knowledge dies first.

Bodies Remain, but the Colony Hollows Out

What this shows is that a colony "remaining" and a colony "continuing" are not the same thing.

Count from the outside and the rats are still there. But inside, what can be passed to the next generation is shrinking. Teachers decrease, knowledge decreases, and the adults who hold that knowledge decrease further. Only bodies remain, and culture drains away. Collapse looks full for a while, even as it empties out.

The culture of the voice turns gray from the most complex items first, and the song grows quiet
The culture of the voice turns gray from the most complex items first. The bodies are still there, but the song grows quiet.

Limits

Let me be clear. The "culture" here is not a claim that real rats build up anything this complex. A culture that accumulates complexity is where this model steps one pace beyond actual rats. Read it as a thought experiment with a minimal intelligent individual wearing a rat's skin.

Even so, something is visible. The recovery of bodies and the loss of knowledge run at different speeds. The count can return while the knowledge does not.

Next

If knowledge dies together with its living teachers, then I can ask: can knowledge be placed outside the teachers?

Can it be kept — written down somewhere, or repeated by everyone — so that it survives even when the individuals who remembered it are gone? Next, I take up records and ritual.

Notes

  1. Cultural complexity and teachers: The more complex a skill or body of knowledge, the more users (demonstrators) it takes to maintain. When the number falls below a threshold, it is lost without being rebuilt. In anthropology this is argued by Henrich and others, and is known from cases such as the simplification of tool technology in Tasmania.